Scientific Truth part 2

Posted on September 24, 2008. Filed under: educational, personal |

I have received several comments about my post called Scientific Truth.  I really appreciate them actually, even though the writers don’t agree with what I am saying.  I can understand why some people may be upset about what I have written.  In this post I am going to try and explain a little more about where I am coming from on the topic of Scientific Truth. 

First of all, I have chosen to be a believer in Jesus.  I believe he came to earth, lived as a man, died on the cross and rose again, justifying us before God.  I also believe that the Bible is complete truth and it points us to Jesus.  Now with that understood you can clearly see where I stand spiritually and maybe listen to where I am coming from.  When I previously mentioned that there is no standard to measure scientific truth with, I mean that there is no “absolutely correct textbook” that has all of the correct answers in it that you can compare experiments and evidence against.  For example, scientists were sure the earth was flat, but it turned out to be round.  People thought the earth was the centre of the universe, but the centre ended up being the sun, chemists thought they knew all the elements of the periodic table, but there were more.  Scientific “truths” continue to change and our knowledge increases, but we can base our ideas only on other ideas, not some textbook of absolute scientific truth.  I believe that the Bible is in fact God’s absolute truth and we can base our ideas of the world from that.

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t want to argue creationism and evolution right now on the blog.  I know where I stand, and I know where other people stand.  Both Creationism and Evolution need faith to believe.  Both are theories and I do believe that neither can be proved 100% true (hence they are theories).  This is why I wanted to let people know that we need to question scientific truth.

Now as a response to the suggestions that I shouldn’t be teaching, I strongly disagree.  I have a desire for my students to be life long learners, and I plan on teaching children so they can grow to become that.  I want to teach my children both evolution and creation so that they can understand from early on that there are critical ways of looking at things, not just from the standard point of evolution is correct.  I don’t want them to just listen to what I say and take it all, I want them to study themselves and seek out their own answers.  Someone wrote a response to my “Kindergarten” post that said “Do you actually believe that Kindergarten to grade 3 students can make a reasonable distinction between actual science and creation ’science’?” and my answer to that is HECK YES! I think that children are some of the only people who can really be objective because they have not had their whole lives to develop their biases.  I will never underestimate the students I work with, and I am excited to teach them all subjects, including science.

Some resources that might help you understand the point I am coming from are below.  They do a much better job at explaining things than I do, and I encourage you to take a look at them.  And again, feel free to comment… I really do appreciate them.

The book The Limitations of Scientific Truth

Magazine Answers in Genesis

The book Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis

Make a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...

%d bloggers like this: